Rating values in sex and dating

The table above breaks down how good looking you are with no other factors considered on a scale of 1/10.

Follow the example outlined in the table to get your score per category and add them together for a total of 10.

In short everyone acts in their own self interest and wants to make the best deal for themselves.

Discussion focused on reasons people persist in using cute-flippant opening lines and on an attributional analysis of responses to opening lines.

That's not the worst thing, but I'd like it just attached to the aggregate Rating; do you know how to solve this without mucking up the current markup organization?

Assuming you mean you want it only attached to the Product, as per your penultimate paragraph, and not only attached the aggregate Rating as per per your last paragraph, then the best I can come up is The itemscope on the h1 hides the h1's children from the aggregate Rating item, so the name property will only be attached to the Product item via the product Microdata itemref.

In RDFa syntax, it is better to use the native RDFa syntax - the 'typeof' attribute - for multiple types.

tools may have only weaker understanding of extra types, in particular those defined externally. A short description of the item used to disambiguate from other, similar items.

Search for rating values in sex and dating:

rating values in sex and dating-86rating values in sex and dating-49rating values in sex and dating-81

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “rating values in sex and dating”